Does Movement Always Have to be Perfect?
Quality before quantity, not instead of.....

** usual opening caveat: it is well beyond the scope of this short piece to address myriad pretexts and contexts and as such this represents one opinion aimed at ‘most people, most of the time’.
Does training need to be perfect?
Just to be clear, we love it when our guys get to really give it some welly, as many will testify, but we always insist on ‘quality first’, but what does this really mean in practice?
What it doesn’t mean is that everyone has to be perfect at every exercise and every movement pattern. Neither does it mean that everyone spends all their time working on posture, mobility and movement skills.
What it does mean is that we ascertain where your highest capability is and we aim to work you at that level. But first we have to get you there by matching your ability to your capability. It is worth cutting in here to highlight the difference between capabilities and abilities. Abilities are what you can do right now. Capabilities are what your body has the capacity to do. To elaborate slightly, your capabilities are the things which your body has the fundamental capacity to do and your abilities are your current skills and proficiencies in the process of voluntarily utilising that capacity. For example, your shoulder girdle and shoulder joint may have the capacity to move through a full and normal range of motion but your ability to control that shoulder complex through a full and normal range of motion is reduced for some reason so your body restricts your motion via tightness. So, you have a greater shoulder capacity than your ability to actually make optimal use of it. This was covered a little more here; (Is repeated static stretching a solution for long-term tightness? (crescenthealthandfitness.co.uk)) Most people have less ability than they do capability when it comes to motor control, i.e they’re not using their body at it’s full potential due to a lack of optimal control. Let’s just interject again to discuss motor control, then we’ll get into what this means for quality over quantity. Bear with me, we’re nearly at the main point, I promise. Motor control has been described as the purposeful, voluntary process of initiating, directing and grading movement. In other words, your ability to get your muscles to fire just the right amount at just the right time to achieve just the right motion just when you want it to. No more, no less. In order to achieve this we need to be able to determine exactly where our body is in space – often referred to as proprioception – and how our body parts are moving, especially relative to other body parts – often referred to as kinesthesia. This is movement quality.
Sadly, many people wish to train hard and get stronger but often see less benefit in improving movement skill.
So, if we don’t move as well as we could, is the best strategy to get stronger, or to get better, then get stronger? Or to use a driving analogy; to get to your destination quickest, is it better to drive faster, or to drive in the right direction, then drive faster? Whilst the answer may seem obvious, it can be difficult, and even frustrating sometimes, to take a diversion or even go full speed in what feels like reverse for a while in order to ensure we’re going the right way. But, it will be quicker in the long run. If you stick to it through the slow start.
Now, I’m sure we can all name several top-level athletes who perform amazingly with less-than-optimal biomechanics but be assured, these guys are the exception, not the rule! And of course we’ll all know many people who move badly and never have any pain or injuries. And, Uncle Steve who smoked forty a day and was as fit as a fiddle and Aunt Mary who never got burgled in spite of never locking her door and the guy next door who never wears a seat belt etc, etc, etc. All these guys are great/unharmed in spite of their approach, not because of their approach.
Moving as well as you can helps to get you healthy and strong, can help you maintain strength and endurance whilst reducing your risk of injury, even into old age. Moving as well as possible can help to reduce uneven and disproportionate loads placed on the tissues of your body. Moving well can help to improve the structure and function of your body, improving efficiency and movement performance whether in your daily life or sporting activities without potentially injurious compensatory movement. It helps most of us run faster, hit harder and reach further. It helps most of us develop greater control over our bodies via improved proprioception and kinesthetic awareness. It helps us achieve more with less effort.
Strength and repetition vs skill acquisition.
Many people I offer advice to have previously been advised to add repetition to their dysfunction by way of a solution. To ‘squat more’ in order to improve their squatting technique, for instance, and I have had discussions myself with many people, including newer professionals, who believe more will spontaneously result in better whilst missing the ironic paradox that if the actual act of squatting made us squat well nobody would squat badly. You’ll simply get more efficient at squatting badly. Another common strategy is to layer strength onto dysfunction. This, in my opinion, is the most difficult one to challenge with people who have been engaged in this approach for a short while because they will likely have received a range of perceived benefits including feeling fitter, having more energy, experience less pain and have witnessed progress in the gym such as using heavier weights. These people will have developed increased resiliency to their issues without necessarily improving their skill level and reducing their dysfunctions in any way. Of course, for some people, some of the time, this can be their best strategy, such as sports participants who’s ‘dysfunction’ makes them great at their sport, although this of course needs managing to mitigate the knock on effects as much as possible (a topic for another day). Whilst best is highly subjective, we should all aim to be our best and this is best done with a solid foundation of the best movement quality we are capable of. Strength and other common markers of fitness will typically degrade with age at a much faster rate than efficient skill. Improve your movement skill if you can and maintain it as long as possible.
If you’re still not convinced, consider anyone in their 80’s and older who developed a high level of skill in their sport or profession and witness how they often maintain even the smallest nuances of the skills they developed when they were young in spite of losing their strength and endurance. I remember being a young lad and visiting my local barber. Toward the end he had sadly developed severe Parkinson’s and was almost completely unable to maintain his own balance to the point that he propped himself against the counter and often failed to retrieve coins from the till due to diminished control. BUT! The second that shaver touched your head he was as steady as a rock until he removed it. I was amazed and intrigued by this every time I saw him until he retired. Bless him. I imagine that was one of the last skills he lost as his body was so proficient and efficient at doing it. I have heard many similar stories from other therapists whom specialise in Parkinson’s and similar.
It’s a mindset thing.
In a nutshell; we don’t view movement as a skill in the same way that we view sports and other activities as a skill. Just as we can be terrible at football or gymnastics or dancing we can be terrible at walking, running, getting up off the floor and reaching into cupboards. Whatever your sport or activity, you’re a human first; become a better human and you’ll become better at everything you do. Start by ensuring you have the skill to control your body to your full capacity at a fundamental level and build up from there. We all know the saying about houses built on strong foundations.
I hope that helps.
Tell a friend...







