** opening caveat: it is well beyond the scope of this short piece to address myriad pretexts and contexts and as such this represents one opinion aimed at most people, most of the time.
Before we begin to discuss muscle tightness it is essential to understand what muscle tightness is and how it develops. Earlier this year, a multidisciplinary research team of clinicians concluded by consensus that muscle tightness could be defined via the following attributes “limited range of motion, loss of function, changes in muscle texture, change in sensation, asymmetry, pain, and contracted state of muscle”. They went on to note that these attributes are “largely subjective and are interrelated”.
Whilst the above are all perfectly valid interpretations of how muscle tightness manifests itself, they fall some way short of offering a simple, usable explanation of how tightness actually emerges in the first instance. Notwithstanding the presence of a neurological disorder or similar pathology (please refer to the usual opening caveat above) here’s the way I like to describe the process of tightness………
Tightness is the way in which your body uses your muscles to develop stability and it is developed by the body as per the demands placed upon it. Of course, this stability can certainly become excessive and it can certainly become inappropriate to optimal function, but it is developed by the body as per the daily demands to which it is exposed. Figuratively speaking, your tightness is the product of the combination of what you do most often and unforeseen events. Practically speaking, your tightness is the product of the combination of habitual movement behaviours and accidental injuries/surgical interventions.
To broaden that statement a little; when we are born, our muscles provide us almost no functional stability. We have huge amounts of mobility, but we have no stability aside the structural stability offered by our fundamental physiological make-up, for instance from the shape of our skeleton and joint configurations. At the time of our birth our muscles can do very little. Because they have thus far done very little. From birth onwards we begin to make attempts to use our body and our body reciprocates by developing the ability to be used. Our bodies develop in ways which facilitate the doing of that which we attempt to do regularly. Within days of being born we begin to attempt to turn our head from side to side to look for Mum and as a direct result of this we begin to develop stability in our neck. We quickly progress by making attempts to turn onto our front in order to make better use of our arms and legs which we then attempt to use to achieve locomotion. Very quickly we no longer need to look around for Mum – we can go and find her. All this activity stimulates our body to develop more and more stability. First in the neck, then the core, then the shoulders, the hips, the legs and so on. This infantile process does not occur spontaneously, nor does it end at maturity. It is activity-driven and continues until we die. Constantly updating our settings according to use. The constant process of our body facilitating our ability to perform movements which we attempt repeatedly. And the more we do a thing, the better we get at doing it. Fundamentally, this is how tightness develops. Tightness is simply inappropriate or excessive (or both) stability. If we perform inappropriate movement behaviours, this is what our bodies get great at. In addition to this, every accident, injury and surgery we experience during our lives serves to provide more stimuli to which our body will respond by moving differently and then over time ‘perfecting’ it’s ability to move that way. Practice makes perfect but a wise man once said perfect practice makes perfect - crappy practice, makes you perfectly crappy.
With that in mind, aggressive static stretching can not be the solution to long-term tight muscles because it does not have the capacity to elicit the necessary physiological response; namely, lasting changes in movement behaviour. That is not to say there is no place for stretching. Merely, that it is rarely, if ever, successful at providing long-term relief to long-term tightness. Indeed, very often it can serve to exacerbate the underlying issue by further aggravating tissues which are already chronically overworked. This typically results in increased tightness, and so the self-perpetuating cycle of tight-stretch-relief-tight continues. A better strategy is to identify and address the underlying cause and eliminate tightness where possible, or manage it where appropriate. Management strategies and the reasons for them is a thread for another day; where ‘most people, most of the time’ are concerned, eliminating inappropriate tightness is the goal.
Here are some of the points I use to develop an effective strategy for addressing the problem of muscular tightness:
· Identify the tissue(s) which presents as tight e.g muscles in the low back
· Consider previous injury/injuries
· Evaluate habitual behaviours i.e. postures and activities
· Identify motor-control issues within the affected body segment – how does it function in isolation?
· Evaluate inter-segmental relationships to determine reciprocal/compensatory behaviours - how does it function in conjunction with adjacent body parts?
· Evaluate the whole body in the above manner beginning at the affected segment and working further away, segment by segment
In practice, I am concerned with identifying and evaluating the motor strategies by which movement occurs. This starts with what I refer to as a segmental approach. Functionally speaking, the body is essentially a stack of alternating mobile and stable segments. In reality of course there is no exclusivity of either attribute; mobile segments require stability and vice versa but broadly speaking some segments of our body are inherently stable and others inherently mobile.
Mobile segments:
· Ankle
· Hip
· Upper back
· Shoulder joint
Stable segments:
· Knee
· Low back
· Shoulder girdle
The long explanation is another thread for another day but in short, one or more segments within this mobile-stable stack often becomes affected by life’s activities as discussed above and the effects on one segment will further have effects on adjacent segments causing further dysfunction. For instance, tight hips will typically result in a loss of stability at the knee and/or low back. The first task in reducing tightness is to rebalance this stack by optimising stability and mobility in the areas which are deficient and bring about better control and improved movement patterns.
Stability first
Where range of motion is adequate - and most tightness still allows for adequate range of motion even if it’s less than optimal - I commonly address stability and control issues prior to addressing reduced mobility. The body will typically default to stiffness when presented with uncontrolled movement. That is to say, if the body is encouraged to move with inadequate control, the body will ‘stiffen’ in order to reduce the risk of injury via reduced motion. This lack of stability and control is one of the most common underlying causes of tightness.
A good place to begin is with the lumbo-pelvic region (low back and pelvis). The low back relies on stability to support the function of the torso and upper limbs and is pivotal in the transference of force from the ground/lower body. Furthermore, the lumbo-pelvic segment is the most central segment of the body, is in closest proximity to the centre of balance and acts as the foundational ‘seat’ of the core. For those reasons, this segment has significant potential to both affect and be affected by the rest of the body and as such is rarely unaffected by musculoskeletal conditions including excessive tightness. With that in mind, focussing on this segment first typically offers the greatest bang-for-the-buck and provides a sound platform upon which to address and develop all other segments, progressing segment by segment according to individual requirements to restore appropriate stability and mobility accordingly.
I hope this brief explanation goes some way to providing an understanding of the nature of stiffness and some of the fundamental principles of what is required to effectively address the issue.
Take home points:
· Tightness = stability (even if it’s ‘bad’)
· Tightness is mostly in response to movement behaviours
· The body will always choose stiffness over lack of control
· Control is not the same as proficiency (you may be great at something which is not actually good for you – even if it feels good!)
· Overworked muscles are usually compensating for an under working muscle nearby
· Under working muscles reduce stability
· Reduced stability increases stiffness/tightness
· Very often, attempts to reduce stiffness not only fail but commonly make things worse as it could increase vulnerability in the area which the stiffness is working to protect (tight-stretch-relief-tight)
· Address stability prior to increasing mobility (providing mobility is ‘adequate’)
· Start centrally and work out from there
· Remember: pain doesn’t always mean STOP, but it’s a good idea to PAUSE until you find out what it does mean, just in case
© Crescent Health and Fitness 2022
Abbeydale Squash and Fitness Club
Abbeydale Road South
Sheffield
S17 3LJ